In defining economic development in the technical sense—attracting companies—the article emphasizes a point that is nearly always confused in economic development discussions in New Mexico. The distinction is that below a certain size community, "economic development" simply doesn't apply. For economic development and for Elida, Roy and Cuba, "There is no there, there," as Gertrude Stein said 71 years ago of Oakland, California.
The discussion should be about "developing the economy." An attempt to grapple with the problem came in the background document for the recent New Mexico First town hall on "rural-urban economic development." New Mexico First accepted the Census Bureau definition that "urban" means a metropolitan statistical area, of which there are four in New Mexico, and everything else is rural. Well, there is rural and there is rural, as the document admitted, allowing that the challenges of Roy and Elida were different than for "less rural" communities such as Gallup. I haven't seen the recommendations from the town hall yet, but will comment when I do.
Accepting the standard rural/urban distinction also overlooks some situations that are a function of New Mexico having large counties. Cuba, for example, though very rural (as NM First puts it), is part of metro Albuquerque and therefore outside the town hall's purview. So is Sunland Park, a small somewhat rural city that is part of metro Las Cruces.
No comments:
Post a Comment